Talk:X-Japan
From Fan History Wiki
| This discussion is listed as an Active Talk Page. Please remove this template when the conversation has run its course. |
[edit] Need citations
Because the neutrality of this article is disputed, citations are needed to either shore up or debunk the POV represented here, particularly in the Kerfuffles section. Edits to bring the article to a more neutral POV are welcome, and you are invited to bring any concerns to the talk page. We would rather that an article's problems be dealt with in an open manner where any and all parties involved can have a voice. --Tikatu 01:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that the article needs references and links to back-up the documentation of the kerfluffles. While I don't necessarily doubt they happened, they need context and should contain more than one person's viewpoint on these events. The article also needs more information in the other sections of the article so it doesn't just read like someone's personal grudge against the fandom. That said, I see no need to delete the article or the challenged information until more information is provided.--Sidewinder 13:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Policy is not to delete fandom articles. We do allow some flexibility for these sort of things but this isn't a case where that would be. I'm not even certain it would really be eligible for deleting and restoring with a clean version. There don't appear to be any privacy violations that would justify that. It does need to have more information added to it. Maybe add some more LiveJournal dates? And MySpace, orkut, bebo dates? Add more canon information to give a better perspective on when these things happened in relation to that? What we really need is some one from the fandom to help improve it as I'm not certain, as outsiders, how much we can do right now with the problem sections other than just burying them under data. --Laura 14:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] More information
I tried to add more information to the article to make it less focused on the wank. --Betsyb 14:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
